The End of Welfare State in Europe

In a televised speech before the Dutch parliament on Tuesday, King Willem-Alexander said that the welfare state of the 20th century is gone and should be replaced by a society in which people create their own social and financial safety nets with less help from the state. The focus of the address, written for the king by Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s government, was that the current levels at which the state pays for unemployment benefits and subsidized health care are unsustainable amid Europe’s ongoing economic woes. While the king’s speech does not necessarily portend an end of the welfare state in the Netherlands, it was a relatively rare acknowledgment of the severity of the European crisis by the Continental elite.

The king’s words were highly symbolic for several reasons. The welfare state, where the state is expected to ensure the well-being of its population from cradle to grave, is mainly a European creation. It emerged in its earliest forms in the late 19th century in Bismarck’s Germany, and it took root in the United Kingdom, Nordic Europe and other parts of the continent in the 1930s in response to the Great Depression. Since the end of World War II, it has become a central element of fiscal and economic policies throughout Western Europe, though systems vary from one country to the next. Today, the welfare state is part of the backbone of modern Europe.

What is a Geopolitical Diary? George Friedman explains.

Though limited reforms have been enacted over the decades, the European elite – whether from the center-right or the center-left – have resisted challenging the welfare state, since it is part of the social contract between Europe’s rulers and the ruled. However, the European crisis is threatening the long-term survival of the system, with economic problems raising serious questions about its sustainability, as well as the very definition of the nation-state in Europe.

Europe’s plight is actually a combination of several crises over issues ranging from competitiveness to demographics. In the six decades that followed the end of World War II, the Europeans built large, heavy nation-states that eventually became financially unsustainable. Prior to the financial turmoil that began in 2007, most Western European governments covered their structural shortcomings by issuing debt. This allowed states to postpone painful structural reforms and the electoral backlash that were likely to follow. The introduction of the euro in the early 2000s further complicated matters, since countries no longer had the ability to use monetary policy to compensate for their lost competitiveness.

Now, the European crisis is forcing most Western European countries to face the consequences of their inability to implement reforms. For decades, the Europeans enjoyed the benefits of the welfare state essentially without addressing its costs. But the crisis has accelerated a day of reckoning that seemed inevitable, since Europe’s shrinking, aging population (which will substantially reduce European labor forces and tax revenues) would have forced most governments to eventually implement structural reforms anyway.

2 comentarii

  1. Da, am urmarit cu interes discursul si reactiile la el… Sigur ca un discurs nu poate modifica prea multe, e mai mult un semnal simbolic de alarma. Dar comentariul FT este foarte pertinent. Cred ca majoritatea welfare-states din W Europa se vor confrunta cu presiunea de a reduce generosul sprijin social pe care l-au promovat dupa WWII.

    In Olanda sistemul este incredibil de complex cu formule de asistenta spre exemplu in domeniul sanatate pentru aproape orice tip de limitare fizica/psihica oricat de mica. De la ingrijire acasa (cu institutii de stat si private care se ocupa de tot) pana la ingrijire institutionala cu spital clasic, spital de recuperare, spital de ingrijire, casa de ingrijire, casa de batrani, ospiciu, sanatoriu (si chiar nu le-am enumerat pe toate), transport specializat gratuit, reduceri peste tot, etc – totul in sistemul all-inclusive in care familia nu trebuie sa miste un deget si totul e gratis. Eu inca descopar facilitatile, ma mir si imi pare rau ca sunt inca (relativ) tanar ca sa mai apuc sa ma bucur de „faceti voi tot pentru mine”. Nu cred ca sistemul va supravietui in formatul actual, este imposibil ca aceste costuri sa poate fi suportate a la long, asa ca reforma si „limitarile” vor veni in curand.

    Interesant va fi de vazut cum vor contrabalansa masurile de „austeritate” cu presiunea politica legata de „restrictii”. Nu va fi deloc usor. Pe de alta parte asta ar putea fi sansa unor tari UE periferice (vezi Ro) unde acoperirea sociala nu este atat de larga si unde unele masuri de austeritate (vezi salarii bugetare) au fost deja luate. Poate pastrand un timp si distanta fata de Euro, avand in vedere nevoia continua de competitivitate externa.

    1. Un timp? Eu nu cred ca Romania apuca sa intre in euro pana la dezintegrarea euro…
      Da, e fascinant nivelul de welfare din Olanda, dar plusul de competitivitate e la tari precum Australia sau cele din Asia mai mult decat la estul Europei, care tanjeste (si emuleaza, la nivelul lor de posibilitati) sistemul europei de nord/vest.
      Nu ne-am nascut, si din pacate inca nu am ajuns in locul potrivit…

Lasă un răspuns

Completează mai jos detaliile tale sau dă clic pe un icon pentru a te autentifica:


Comentezi folosind contul tău Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Fotografie Google+

Comentezi folosind contul tău Google+. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Poză Twitter

Comentezi folosind contul tău Twitter. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Fotografie Facebook

Comentezi folosind contul tău Facebook. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Conectare la %s